© everlark

professionalchaoticdumbass:

jamesroachmusic:

soselfimportant:

4:35 Blaze it sorry traffic was crazy

oh we missed the ten year anniversary of the worst post i’ve ever made

traffic again?

gallusrostromegalus:

teresa-belfiore-deactivated2022:

No one:

Absolutely no one:

Edward:


image

I’ll take “Exact sentences I have heard out of every farm kid I know” for $400 Alex.

palipunk:

Massive fuck you to everyone who is talking about Palestinians as if we’re already all dead and sharing more solidarity with our corpses than us living. “We will never forget the beautiful Palestinian people-“ how about you stop “making peace” with Palestinian extermination. My people are not going to be forgotten because we are going to live. Palestinians have already survived one genocide and have been surviving one ever since.

Do not ever let the idea that all Palestinians are going to die exist in your mind. Mourn the dead, fight like hell for the living.

imburningupandout:

People who honestly think there shouldn’t be a proshot release of theater shows because then people wouldn’t go to the theater anymore are so fucking dumb holy shit how dumb do you have to be did people stop watching footbal games because it also airs on tv? did people stop going to concers because you could get the dvd? holy shit just let poor people have a taste of the thing too god damn it

hugsforvillains:

erikkillmongerdontpullout:

horrorgirlxhorrorgirl:

fairycosmos:

i hate how they market alexa as a ‘member of the family’ like that’s SO fucking blatantly insidious and terrifying also if i wanted an untrustworthy/cold/emotionless machine in my life i’d just talk to my fuckin father 

image
image
image
image

“Guys stop bullying my wiretap”

image

probablyasocialecologist:

If protesting is banned, BDS is banned, holding a Palestinian flag or wearing a keffiyeh gets you harassed or fined, expressing your pro-palestine views on media platforms gets you shadowbanned or worse, affects your livelihood—What nonviolent resistance do y’all want?  — Yasmine • لِلآ يَاسمِين 🍊🇵🇸🇦🇲 (@YasmineJibril) October 13, 2023ALT

videogomez:

videogomez:

image
image

powerburial:

snekbitch666:

powerburial:

Babe, ever since I met you, your power level has been over 9000. With you, I know the cake won’t be a lie. Together we can rule the galaxy, and all their base will belong to us. I can haz marriage?

OP I am going to break into your house and unleash a horde of locusts in your closet if you don’t stop

wouldn’t even notice with the type of shit i got goin on

trillscienceofficer:

I got a copy of “The Ferengi Rules of Acquisition” and the whiplash I got going from rule #112 to #113…

#112  Never have sex with the boss's sister.ALT
#113  Always have sex with the boss.ALT

‘by Quark as told to Ira Steven Behr’ indeed lol

mostlysignssomeportents:

“Having refused the poor what is necessary, they give the rich what is superfluous.”


image

It is not because of the few thousand francs which would have to be spent to put a roof over the third-class carriages or to upholster the third-class seats that some company or other has open carriages with wooden benches. What the company is trying to do is to prevent the passengers who can pay the second class fare from traveling third class; it hits the poor, not because it wants to hurt them, but to frighten the rich. And it is again for the same reason that the companies, having proved almost cruel to the third-class passengers and mean to the second-class ones, become lavish in dealing with first-class passengers. Having refused the poor what is necessary, they give the rich what is superfluous.

-Jules Dupuis

(h/t Andrew Odlyzko)

internetslice:

chaoticneutralcunt:

if i was a little kitty and you were a little kitty would you touch noses with me to say hi

rb to touch prevs kitty nose to say hi

spade-n-archer:

earths-roots-grow-up:

varginhamonologues:

heterorealism:

image

Truck comes first and if there is any money left over the kids may eat. - Modern Consumer Patriarchy

image

she got her degree and started removing the parasite 🙏

Tinfoil hat moment but I don’t think he was dumb, I think he was strategic. He put her in a situation in which she had to either: sell her car (so the only means of transportation is now in his name), or maybe even to drop out (to have time for the second job) if she wants to feed the kids. He did it right when she was aaaaaalmost done with her degree. Either way, it’s sabotage.

Sometimes when an action makes NO sense to us (“he’s like a stupid alien”), it’s bc we are not understanding its true motivation/purpouse. If his goal was control, financial pressure and limiting her options due to lack of funds, it makes perfect sensie to buy the truck.

Tinfoil hat moment over!

I wanna add that a lot of times people look at abusers like they are Moriarty, and assume that their actions are planned ahead of time. But I think most abusers are actually really impulsive and really bad at planning more than a few moves ahead.

Therefore, here is an alternative explanation based entirely on his impulsive feelings:

She’s getting near the end of her degree, she’s going to be making a lot more than him when she finishes. This makes him angry and jealous. The closer she gets to finishing, the stronger his anger and jealousy gets.

Well, if she’s gonna be making so much more than me, the least she can do is pay for my truck. And maybe if she had to pay for this truck she wouldn’t even be able to finish school. Then I’d still be man of the house. That would really show her whose boss. Now I feel more in control and less jealous.

“Honey, I bought a truck.”

I think we often talk about abusers like we talk about evolution. We say polar bears evolved to have white coats for camouflage. We talk about evolution like it has a plan and is doing things on purpose. But evolution doesn’t care about camouflage. Birth rates are all that matter, but evolution doesn’t even “care” about them.

I think the majority of abusers don’t actually plan things out. They just act impulsively on malicious feelings. It makes them feel good to have lots of power, so they take whatever power they can find. It makes them feel good to make their victims uncomfortable so they do that.

Most abuse tactics can be explained (and should be defended against) as if they are strategic. Just like evolution, it’s just easier to talk about that way. But I think most abuser tactics are really just the consequence of impulsively acting on malicious feelings.

Basically: I don’t think you need a tinfoil hat. Abusers like gaining power. And they don’t need conspiracy or long term planning to get that power.

mckitterick:

Job advice #1014

three boxes of pizza and drinks on a table presumably in a workplace meeting room, with text that says, Eat their pizza and form a union anyway.ALT

Eat their pizza and form a union anyway.

sirfrogsworth:

image

I’m not upset that blu-rays are being phased out. Formats all become obsolete and then die out.

My worry is there is not an adequate replacement for physical media. If you stream a 4K movie, it is usually over compressed and has a lossy audio track. Usually the quality *improves* when you move on to the next thing. But in this case, only the convenience is improved.

And there is no way to truly own the media you buy online. Even on Amazon when you “buy” something, that just means you have indefinite access to the file on their server. But if they lose the rights to that content or decide to delete it for tax purposes, you lose it too.

There is a service called Kaleidescape. It allows you to download blu-ray quality movie files onto local storage. Unfortunately the service has way too many caveats. You can only play the movies on their proprietary equipment. If they go out of business you will lose all of your movie purchases. And while they have a lot of mainstream, big budget movies, their selection is far from vast.

Oh, and their hardware starts at $8,000 and each movie is between $10 and $30 to purchase. And if you want to save more than 125 movies, the cost balloons to nearly $20K for the hardware.

The quality issue will eventually solve itself. New codecs like AV1 and H.266 will allow files to be compressed without losing any quality.

But I have no idea what to do about being unable to truly own your media. No studio will agree to DRM-free downloads that you can store anywhere and play with any device.

Maybe they can create a system where you can register any device you own and be allowed to play the file on those registered devices. So you get a file you can download, but the DRM requires verification you own the device it is being played on.

Perhaps they could designate a few cloud storage services as approved download platforms. You are free to shift your media from cloud to cloud, but it must always stay on the cloud and be registered to you. That way if a cloud storage company bites the dust, you still have the option to move your media to another place.

It’s not as good as DRM-free local storage, but I don’t see studios agreeing to anything else.

In truth, people are probably never going to buy movies in the future. If you have the option to rent for $3 or buy for $20, people probably aren’t going to see the value in spending that much to own a movie.

Maybe the solution lies in some kind of law. If a platform no longer wishes to host a show or movie and they can’t sell it to another streaming service, then they must give up the rights and allow the Library of Congress to save and distribute it.